An international consensus on gaps in mechanisms of forced-based manipulation research: findings from a nominal group technique.

Force-Based Manipulation (FBM) including light touch, pressure, massage, mobilization, thrust manipulation, and needling techniques are utilized across several disciplines to provide clinical analgesia. These commonly used techniques demonstrate the ability to improve pain-related outcomes; however, mechanisms behind why analgesia occurs with these hands-on interventions has been understudied. Neurological, neuroimmune, biomechanical, neurovascular, neurotransmitter, and contextual factor interactions have been proposed to influence response; however, the specific relationships to clinical pain outcomes has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to identify gaps present within mechanism-based research as it relates to FBM. An international multidisciplinary nominal group technique (NGT) was performed and identified 37 proposed gaps across eight domains. Twenty-three of these gaps met consensus across domains supporting the complex multisystem mechanistic response to FBM. The strength of support for gaps within the biomechanical domain had less overall support than the others. Gaps assessing the influence of contextual factors had strong support as did those associating mechanisms with clinical outcomes (translational studies). The importance of literature investigating how FBM differs with individuals of different pain phenotypes (pain mechanism phenotypes and clinical phenotypes) was also presented aligning with other analgesic techniques trending toward patient-specific pain management (precision medicine) through the use of pain phenotyping.

Identifying priority gaps in contextual factors research and force-based manipulation. An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: To establish priority gaps related to contextual factors (CFs) research and force-based manipulation (FBM). METHODS: A three-round Delphi following recommended guidelines for conducting and reporting Delphi studies (CREDES) involving international and interdisciplinary panelists with expertise in CFs and FBM. Round 1 was structured around two prompting questions created by the workgroup. Ranking of each priority gap was done by calculating composite scores for each theme generated. Consensus threshold was set with an agreement ≥75% among panelists. Median and interquartile range were calculated for each priority gap to provide the central tendency of responses. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the consistency and stability of responses between rounds 2 and 3. RESULTS: Forty-six panelists participated in all three rounds of the Delphi. Consensus was reached for 16 of 19 generated themes for priority gaps in CFs research and FBM. The ranking of each identified gap was computed and presented. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was non-significant (P > .05), demonstrating consistency and stability of results between rounds. CONCLUSION: The result of this Delphi provides international and interdisciplinary consensus-based priority gaps in CFs research and FBM. The gaps identified can be used to generate future research inquiries involving CFs research and FBM.

An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique.

Objective: Emerging literature suggests contextual factors are important components of therapeutic encounters and may substantially influence clinical outcomes of a treatment intervention. At present, a single consensus definition of contextual factors, which is universal across all health-related conditions is lacking. The objective of this study was to create a consensus definition of contextual factors to better refine this concept for clinicians and researchers. Design: The study used a multi-stage virtual Nominal Group Technique (vNGT) to create and rank contextual factor definitions. Nominal group techniques are a form of consensus-based research, and are beneficial for identifying problems, exploring solutions and establishing priorities. Setting: International. Main outcome measures: The initial stages of the vNGT resulted in the creation of 14 independent contextual factor definitions. After a prolonged discussion period, the initial definitions were heavily modified, and 12 final definitions were rank ordered by the vNGT participants from first to last. Participants: The 10 international vNGT participants had a variety of clinical backgrounds and research specializations and were all specialists in contextual factors research. Results: A sixth round was used to identify a final consensus, which reflected the complexity of contextual factors and included three primary domains: (1) an overall definition; (2) qualifiers that serve as examples of the key areas of the definition; and (3) how contextual factors may influence clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Our consensus definition of contextual factors seeks to improve the understanding and communication between clinicians and researchers. These are especially important in recognizing their potential role in moderating and/or mediating clinical outcomes.

Evaluating the efficacy of oxytocin for pain management: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

Background: There is a need for novel analgesics with favorable risk to benefit profiles. Oxytocin has recently gained attention for its potential analgesic properties. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effect of oxytocin for pain management. Method: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles reporting on associations between oxytocin and chronic pain management from January 2012 to February 2022. Studies published before 2012 that were identified in our previous systematic review were also eligible. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Synthesis of results was performed using meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Results: Searches returned 2087 unique citations. In total, 14 articles were included that reported on 1504 people living with pain. Results from meta-analysis and narrative review were mixed. Meta-analysis of three studies indicated that exogenous oxytocin administration did not result in a significant reduction in pain intensity relative to placebo (N = 3; n = 95; g = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.10, 0.73). Narrative review provided encouraging evidence that exogenous oxytocin administration reduced pain sensitivity among individuals with back pain, abdominal pain, and migraines. Results suggested that individual difference factors (e.g., sex and chronic pain condition) may influence oxytocin-induced nociception, but the heterogeneity and limited number of studies identified precluded further investigation. Discussion: There is equipoise for the benefit of oxytocin for pain management. Future studies are imperative and should undertake more precise exploration of potential confounds and mechanisms of analgesic action to clarify inconsistency in the literature.

Contexte: Il existe un besoin de nouveaux analgésiques présentant un profil de risque/bénéfice favorable. L'ocytocine a récemment attiré l'attention pour ses propriétés analgésiques potentielles.Objectif: L'objectif de cette étude était d'effectuer une mise à jour d'une revue systématique et une méta-analyse pour évaluer l'effet de l'ocytocine pour la gestion de la douleur.Méthode: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL et Clinicaltrials.gov pour y repérer des articles sur les associations entre l'ocytocine et la prise en charge de la douleur chronique de janvier 2012 à février 2022. Les études publiées avant 2012 qui ont été recensées dans notre revue systématique précédente était également admissibles. Le risque de biais des études incluses a été évalué. Une synthèse des résultats a été réalisée à l'aide d'une méta-analyse et d'une synthèse narrative.Résultats: Les recherches ont permis de recenser 2 087 citations uniques. Au total, 14 articles portant sur 1 504 personnes vivant avec la douleur ont été incluses. Les résultats de la méta-analyse et de l'examen narratif ont été mitigés. Une méta-analyse de trois études a révélé que l'administration d'ocytocine exogène n'avait pas entraîné de réduction significative de l'intensité de la douleur comparativement au placebo (N = 3; n = 95; g = 0,31; Intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC] −0,10 ; 0,73). L'examen narratif a fourni des preuves encourageantes que l'administration d'ocytocine exogène avait réduit la sensibilité à la douleur chez les personnes souffrant de maux de dos, de douleurs abdominales et de migraines. Les résultats indiquent que les facteurs de différence individuels (par exemple, le sexe et la douleur chronique) peuvent influencer la nociception induite par l'ocytocine, mais le nombre limité d'études recensées et leur hétérogénéité a empêché d'approfondir l'enquête.Discussion: Il existe un équilibre au profit de l'ocytocine pour la prise en charge de la douleur. Il est primordial que d'autres études soient menées afin d'explorer de manière plus précise les facteurs de confusion et les mécanismes de l'action analgésique potentiels et ainsi clarifier l'incohérence dans la littérature.